13 Comments
User's avatar
dave's avatar

My next door neighbors car incinerated once and nothing around it burned, not even their rv.

Expand full comment
Joel's avatar

If true treason.

Expand full comment
Korpijarvi's avatar

I hesitate to reply. Feels like sticking one's head up in a game of "suss the public knowledge" whack-a-mole.

I wouldn't call them "fires" given that much of the evidence points away from exothermic combustion.

Metal/glass doesn't have to be hot to flow/become fluid. There are plasma and field effects that can break down molecular structure/matrixes. This is known.

If the cars were in fact exposed to effects that hugely exothermic, how could it not affect nearby vehicles, nor standing vegetation, nor the leaves/moss along the curb?

Why didn't it affect the pavement?

> During summer, especially during heat waves, surface temperatures of roads can soar. Studies have shown that when ambient temperatures reach around 100°F (38°C), the surface temperature of asphalt can exceed 140°F (60°C). At these temperatures, bitumen begins to soften and may even melt, making the asphalt sticky and pliable. This softening effect leads to a series of problems, including rutting, deformation, and the formation of potholes.

https://www.highwaysindustry.com/impact-extreme-heat-roads/

So it's hard to conclude "heat" was the element in play.

I watched the Hall/Brame interview (thanks, hadn't seen that one)...and was wondering. The "Lone Pine" fire--is that the same Lone Pine, CA, where renegade electrical engineer and Tesla (Nikola) technology genius Eric Dollard used to do his experiments?

https://www.amazon.com/Common-Language-Electrical-Engineering-Writings/dp/1518815936

I'm not implying Eric or anyone in his circles was responsible. Especially since we know that weaponized energy technologies are widespread, well developed, and portable. Eric and his circles are more interested in free energy for the good of humanity. But one of the problems with open sourcing any technology is that all sorts of actors can get involved.

But here's the other thing, that I've heard among EE/telcoms guys: fields created by 5G networks, and even by older tech, can set up conditions that can be super energized by incoming solar/galactic currents, producing all sorts of as-yet-unknown effects. Or effects about which there might be a good amount known...and kept classified for good reason.

Is anyone correlating these "attacks" with solar and galactic energy/field activity?

Is there any possibility that at least some of these incidents are kind of...lightning strikes...of a new sort?

There's always talk about fears of a "new/worse Carrington Effect (1859)" taking the power grid down and inconveniencing civilization, but not much discussion of such an energy field creating field/scalar effects in interaction with the human electrical/microwave/etc. energy grid.

Did you know that during that 1859 event, there were arcs leaping from telegraph batteries, cables, and instruments? Did you know that some telegraph operators--after the batteries supplying their stations blew out, or they were asked to disconnect them--found they could connect the armature to ground...and keep drawing a supply?

There is so much we don't know about what electricity is and how it works, and mainstream physics is resistant to dealing with the fact that charge separation seems to be the Loom of God for this entire universe.

Sorry to run on so long, but I've been thinking a lot about this stuff, and don't have time to revise this.

Expand full comment
Protect And Alert's avatar

The cars were HIT with some kind of direct energy weapon obviously. There was no heat wave there on the coast in the winter. There have been over 40 such attacks in CA alone, Lahaina, and many other states and across the globe. Glass begins to melt at 2500 degreesF and tempered auto glass probably hotter. We are under a very hot war satanic attack and the sooner people have the courage to realize this the sooner we can unite to stop it. It is not hard to conclude that a radiation heat so hot it vaporized the car engines, the paint, wheel alloys and the People in the car vaporized ! Gone! Not even DNA left. Who was in those cars is the huge important question. We have a right to know.

Expand full comment
Duchess's avatar

It's so fucking obvious it wasn't natural.

Expand full comment
Mic's avatar

DEW

Expand full comment
pandd's avatar

wow

Expand full comment
Julie's avatar

DEW

Expand full comment
AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

Water makes these fires worse, they aren’t helpful & would have been obvious evidence to this weapon attack. Coincidence, that Maui & Palisades were without water to use for these fires? Nope.

Expand full comment
Robert J. Rei's avatar

Willy Pete. (white Phosphorus)

Expand full comment
Kayla Wildman's avatar

Used to live in CA. Evacuated from four fires. I'm convinced the burning of CA was carefully orchestrated and planned. Chemtrails dropped micro-powdered aluminum for years to make fires fierce and uncontrollable. Years-long drought was weather-engineered. DEW was used to explode houses during fires via PG&E's "smart meters." DEW from military planes was used to blow up PG&E equipment to start the Camp Fire that burned Paradise. (PG&E was used over and over as the "fall guy" re: fire starting.)

Fires caused by lightning, citizen mistakes (like using a hammer to strike a metal stake in unmown dry grass, the cause of Ranch Fire), and amateur arsonists were exploited and "enhanced."

Some fires were deliberately started. LA's head of Public Works accidentally confessed that the Palisades fire was deliberately started; he said LA would be built back to be better than it was "when we started this fire." So...who is "we"?

Expand full comment
Protect And Alert's avatar

Exactly, thank you for your comment.

Expand full comment
Protect And Alert's avatar

Please analyze the photo and post your observations and thoughts.

Expand full comment